Wednesday, September 14, 2011

John Sculley




            In 1983 John Sculley, then head of Pepsi- Cola Co., was approached by a young Steve Jobs who invited him to join Apple as their CEO.  Sculley took the job and would witness Steve Jobs stepping down in 1985, before his own departure in 1993.  Today Sculley serves as a mentor to a number of private companies.  In this interview with Janet Guyon, Sculley talks about his past experience leading companies like Pepsi and Apple.  He also discusses what he thinks it takes to be a great manager.  From this interview I will analyze the type of styles, skills and traits that make Sculley the leader/mentor he is today.
            Upon his graduation from Wharton, Sculley was hired to Pepsi and thrust into the role of an assigned leader.   Sculley states, “I was put into jobs that I wasn't really qualified for because the Pepsi management bench was very thin. It was like a high-wire act experience because I didn't know what I didn't know. But these were great opportunities for me and I managed to succeed.”  This demonstrates Sculley’s use of determination.  Although he lacked experience in the field, Sculley was dedicated to making Pepsi successful.  As part of top management, Sculley demonstrated mostly conceptual skills when it came to his work.  When hired at Apple his main task was to keep the Apple II commercially alive versus the competition for three more years.  Sculley says, “Keeping the Apple II alive didn't require someone to know much about computer technology, it required someone who knew something about how to market and sell a near end-of-life product.”  This demonstrates Sculley’s emphasis on using his conceptual skills over his technical skills.  When I compared John Sculley to the Comprehensive Skills model I noticed certain areas in which Sculley excelled.  His main competency is his problem-solving skills.   When faced with the problem of making a dying product alive versus an emerging competition, Sculley re-marketed the Apple II and kept it selling.  When looking at Sculley’s individual attributes, his motivation cannot be ignored.  At Pepsi and later Apple, he was thrust into a position of leadership.  Sculley demonstrated his willingness to tackle unfamiliar problems, exert his influence, and better his organization.  When asked about how he dealt with the problem of marketing the Apple II Sculley says, “There are moments of transformation in one's career. When you seek alignment between your own interest to grow and be transformed and you get the opportunity to play a key role in an industry that is in the process of transforming. This was one of those key transformational moments.”  This quote shows Sculley's motivation to make Apple successful under his lead.  When evaluating Sculley’s leadership outcome at Apple, his disagreement with Steve Jobs on how to run the company lead to his demise.  From his work at Pepsi and Apple Sculley has gained career experiences which he can now share with the companies he mentors. 
            When asked what it takes to be a good manager Sculley states, “Really good managers want to turn one-off projects into as much of a routine process as they can. I am a project-centric leader. I like to work on projects and solve tough problems. Whereas a really good manager will say, "How do we replicate the processes so that when a problem comes up like this again we can routinely solve it?  That is a very different skill set. It takes both to run a successful company.”
From Sculley’s point of view, it would seem he agrees with J.P. Kotter’s functions of management and leadership.  He also states that it takes both managerial and leadership skills to successfully run a company.  Do you agree that both are necessary to successfully run a company? Is it possible to successfully run a company by only performing management or leadership functions? What do you think?


-Clay Gruenwald

Mark Zuckerberg







Mark Zuckerberg is a very well-known leader across the world. Mark created Facebook in the year 2004, which has experienced wonderful growth since then. When Mark started to invent this Social Network, it was meant for him to communicate with his college friends. It did not stay that way though. By the year 2006, over 7 million users had a Facebook account. Today there are over 750 million users on Facebook. Mark is compared to visionaries such at Steve Jobs and Bill Gates. The article by Wall Street Journal states that Facebook has doubled its revenue to $1.6 billion from about $800 million a year earlier. This change in net income is good for Facebook and demonstrates that Facebook has been a great social network.  

Mark is successful in a few areas. First, out of his personal traits I believe that he has a large amount of determination. According to Tony Martins, Mark “Thinks Big.” An example is when Yahoo asked Facebook a second time to purchase it for $1 billion; Mark would not allow that to happen. He had the willingness to put effort into making Facebook what it is today. Second, Mark has both technical and conceptual skills. The 3-Skills Administrative Approach demonstrates that Top Management does not require as much technical skills. In Marks case, he is very smart when it comes to software and knowing how to program. His conceptual skills are great because he has had many ideas for Facebook and has made those ideas known. I then compared Mark to the Skills Model Approach. Mark is able to use his general and crystallized cognitive ability in order to demonstrate his problem-solving and knowledge skills to show effective leadership. His general cognitive ability came from his childhood. He had a passion for programming and was able to learn more about it as he grew older, while learning more about leadership. Third, Mark would be considered a task-oriented leader. He uses a directive approach towards his group members by giving direction and establishing goals. In the past, he had 3 main goals that he wanted to accomplish. His main goal was to create Facebook to make it easier for friends to communicate. He then chose to extend Facebook membership to the entire world. Lastly, he wanted to open the site to developers and encourage them to build Facebook application. Mark encouraged his team to work hard at accomplishing these tasks.

Recently, Mark had released video chat available for people to use on Facebook. This specific article from the Wall Street Journal is titled “Is Facebook’s Video Chat Really ‘Something Awesome’?” There were reporters that did not care for this because of Google recent group video chat. However, Mark concluded that Facebook’s users base are over 750 million now compared to the 600 million that they did have. He says that this is “awesome.” I personally believe that it was a good idea for Mark to create video chat on Facebook. There are a lot of people that are on Facebook throughout the day and this allows them to stay on Facebook in order to video chat with their friends without having to sign into a different website. What do you think? Do you think that Mark Zuckerberg’s video chat is awesome?


Michelle Fulkerson

    


Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Steve Jobs

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904875404576528981250892702.html

I completed my analysis on a Wall Street Journal article regarding Apple CEO Steve Jobs. This article discussed Steve Jobs announcing his resignation as CEO of Apple and the major impact it plays on Apple and the market as a whole. Steve Jobs was an extremely effective leader as the CEO of Apple. Mr. Job’s leadership helped to keep the company from bankruptcy, but also to become the leading company in its market. I feel that Mr. Jobs has unique traits, skills and an overall leadership style that sets him apart from other successful business leaders. The major leadership traits seem to fit him very well, but two seem to fit better than others. Mr. Jobs seems to excel in the areas of intelligence and determination. Mr. Jobs seems to be outstandingly intelligent in the world of computers and technology. He is an effective leader in this manner, because he knows much more about the field than most people. Mr. Jobs also excels in the area of determination. As the article mentions, he was always looking for new product ideas and ways to create new products. Mr. Jobs showed a great deal of determination in creating new products and quality products.
Mr. Jobs was also very successful as a leader because of the skills he possessed. I found relating this article to the Basic Administrative Skills model to be very interesting. The model shows that as a top manager the level of technical skills decreases. In the case of Mr. Jobs, I think that his level of technical skills was extremely high as he continued to push Apple toward the development of new products. Mr. Jobs seems to be very hands on and a technical leader in the Apple Corporation. I also compared Mr. Jobs to the Skills Model of Leadership, which I analyzed his individual attributes and competencies. Mr. Jobs seems to excel in the areas of general cognitive ability and crystallized cognitive ability. It seems that Mr. Jobs was extremely intelligent in the area of technology that I would guess improved over his tenure working for Apple and developing many new products. What stands out to me is the amount of motivation that Mr. Jobs seemed to have. The article says the Mr. Jobs was always pushing for new product development and design. I feel that Mr. Jobs has an outstanding amount of motivation that helped him as a leader. The two skills that Mr. Jobs seems to excel in are problem solving skills and knowledge. In dealing with creating new products or daily challenges as a CEO, Mr. Jobs would constantly be faced with problems that do not have a right answer, and in some cases, problems that nobody else has faced before. Because of the overwhelming success of Mr. Jobs, it seems that Mr. Jobs excelled in problem solving skills. Mr. Jobs also excelled in the area of knowledge, specifically in the field of technology. Mr. Jobs created new products and designed products that had never before been thought of or created. Because the products that Mr. Jobs created were so successful and led Apple to being such a powerful company, it seems that Mr. Jobs overwhelming excelled in the competency of knowledge. Since Mr. Jobs excelled in various competences, we can see the outcome in the overall performance of Apple as it dominated the technology market.
Using a styles approach, I would classify Mr. Jobs as a team management style. Mr. Jobs worked very closely with co-workers and designers in developing new products. He was very open to their ideas and worked closely with them, which shows that Mr. Jobs has a high concern for people. Mr. Jobs was also very innovative and always working on designing and developing the next new products, which shows he has a very high concern for production. Based on these results, I would classify Mr. Jobs as a team management style leader.
Lastly, Mr. Jobs was a very unique leader in a few ways. Mr. Jobs created a culture and was such an important visionary for Apple. He motivated the company into creative new innovations that lead Apple to becoming the technology giant it is today. As the article states, Mr. Jobs had such a hand in the innovation, creativity and daily operations of the organization. Overall I observed that Mr. Jobs was an extremely effective leader for Apple, which was evident when the stock price fell after his resignation as CEO.  I think the major question that is posed is whether the organization can continue with Mr. Jobs? How much resistance with Mr. Cook face since Mr. Jobs seemed to be well liked and very successful at leading Apple? How will Mr. Cook fill the shoes of Mr. Job is he has a less technical approach to leadership? What do you feel is the long term outlook for Apple

Kyle Burrows

The Next Industrial Revolution

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoO_DwW4nDs

I watched a video on environmental sustainability that was showing the environmental accomplishements of William McDonough and his partners.  Within the video the main theme was that society and especially corporations need to be eco-effective and model a tree. For example a tree produces no waste, everything it does benefits the ecological system in some way.  McDonough is a leader that is not afraid of taking on a challenge, he is very committed and determined to his cause.

Because of this I feel that two of the main leadership traits that have advanced McDonough so far is his intelligence and determination. Throughout the movie you can tell that McDonough's drive never faltered even under what seemed like impossible projects. For instance he was asked by DesignTex to develop a fabric that was completely eco-effective.  During his mission he asked 69 chemical plants to help and all denied, him and his team also researched over 16,000 chemicals and narrowed it down to 16 that we able to be broken down naturally. Once the fabric was put in to production the results were amazing.  Any scrap material that was made was able to be used for mulch since it was biodegradable and there was no waste since all raw material were able to be broken down naturally by the environment. McDonough could have stopped his research after the chemical companies rejected but he pushed forward even more determined and in the end he made a great product that in no way hurts society.  This brings me to my next trait that he possesses: Intelligence. McDonough is very perceptive he saw the need for an environmental change and because of that he is determined to make a difference.

You can also apply McDonough to the skills model.  For instance his problem solving skills are extraordinary; he is able to take the concept of how a tree works and apply it to the manufacturing industry.  It is clear that McDonough has social judgement skills because people come to him and his team to help that make a positive change towards ecological effectiveness.  He also is very clearly knowledgeable he is able to come up with complex ideas and implement them.  Just as the model shows these three competencies lead to effective problem solving and performance.

These are just a few of the things the McDonough and his team have accomplished. I urge all of you to watch the full movie, I'm sure all of you will be just as impressed as i was.  I put the link to the trailer at the top for a quick preview of the movie!  --Brittany

Thursday, September 1, 2011

Introduction

The members of team three consist of Kyle Burrows, Clay Gruenwald, Brittany Bowen, and Michelle Fulkerson.

Our blog will discuss the Big Bang Impact of leadership. We will be analyzing leaders who have demonstrated leadership practices in major corporations or in society. Our group will seek to determine if the leader is effective or ineffective, and give supporting examples to support our answer. We will answer what makes this leader different from other leaders and specifically discuss the different leadership styles,traits, and skills that make them the type of leader they are.